Brisbane Engineering Talent Shortage: Why Retaining Engineers Will Matter as Much as Hiring Them

Nick Koop • August 24, 2026
Man standing in a black polo shirt, smiling in a black-and-white portrait.

About the Author


Nick Koop, Director


With more than 11+ years of recruitment experience, Nick specialises in engineering recruitment across Australia. He has built strong relationships with everyone from boutique consultancies and start-ups through to global engineering firms, earning a reputation for honesty, transparency and doing what he says he'll do.


Born and bred in Melbourne, Nick spends most weekends watching sport, chasing after his young kids, Louey and Odie, or finding an excuse to support a local pub with a well-earned pint.


Contact Nick


Want to discuss your next engineering hire? Give Nick a buzz or drop him a line via:


📲 0426 180 254

📧 nick@vividrecruitment.com.au


You can also connect with Nick on LinkedIn or follow the Vivid Recruitment LinkedIn page for more industry insights, news, jobs and general chit chat and tips!

Brisbane's engineering market is growing, but the talent pool isn't growing at the same pace. With a $119.2 billion Queensland infrastructure programme, continued development and the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games ahead, engineering businesses need to think beyond recruitment. Retaining experienced engineers, developing their teams and creating clear career pathways will be just as important as attracting new talent.

Brisbane is busy.


Spend time speaking with engineering consultancies, candidates and people working across the Built Environment, and the message is consistent: there is a significant amount of work coming through Queensland, and businesses need people to deliver it.


The interesting question is what happens next.


Because while the project pipeline continues to grow, the engineering talent pool remains finite.


That creates a challenge for Brisbane's engineering consultancies. Everyone can compete for talent, but everyone cannot hire the same people.


And that means recruitment is only part of the workforce strategy.


Retention is becoming just as important as attraction.


Why is there an engineering talent shortage in Brisbane?


Queensland's infrastructure pipeline is substantial.


The Queensland Government's 2026–27 Budget includes a $119.2 billion capital programme over four years to 2029–30, covering investment across transport, health, education, energy, water and other major infrastructure.


That investment will require significant engineering capability to design, manage and deliver the projects involved.


Then there is Brisbane 2032.


With six years until the Olympic and Paralympic Games, there is an enormous amount of infrastructure and development activity to plan and deliver.


But it would be a mistake to view Brisbane's engineering demand purely through the Olympic lens.


Queensland has broader infrastructure, energy, transport, health, commercial and development requirements that will continue well beyond 2032.


The question isn't whether there will be enough work.


The question is whether there will be enough experienced people to deliver it.


Brisbane's engineering talent pool isn't unlimited


Queensland's engineering workforce has already grown significantly.


Engineers Australia's analysis of Census data shows that the number of people working in engineering occupations in Queensland increased from 28,525 in 2011 to 42,071 in 2021, an increase of approximately 47%.


That is substantial growth.


But demand is continuing to increase.


Nationally, Engineers Australia expects demand for engineers to grow by around 20% over the next decade, while approximately 70,000 engineers are projected to retire over the same period.


And skills shortages are already being felt across the profession.


In Engineers Australia's 2026 industry survey, 44.4% of respondents identified skills shortages and workforce gaps as the profession's biggest concern, ahead of workforce burnout and workload, funding pressures and project complexity.


For Brisbane businesses, that means the competition for experienced talent is unlikely to disappear simply because more people enter the profession.


The most experienced engineers remain a finite resource.


You can't create ten years of experience because a project needs it.


And you can't recruit your way out of a shortage if every consultancy is trying to hire from the same pool.


Everyone is looking for the same people


This is one of the clearest observations from my recent trip to Brisbane.


The message from engineering businesses was remarkably consistent:

“We need people.”


That's understandable.


The project pipeline is growing. Teams are busy. Businesses are winning work and need the capability to deliver it.


But if every consultancy is looking for experienced civil, structural, electrical, mechanical and other engineering professionals, the market quickly becomes competitive.


One business's recruitment problem can become another business's retention problem.


The engineer you are trying to attract may already be employed by a competitor.


And the engineer your competitor is trying to attract may be one of your strongest people.


This is why the conversation needs to move beyond attraction.


What we're hearing from candidates in Brisbane


During my Brisbane trip, I met with clients and candidates across the market.


Two candidate conversations particularly stood out.


Both candidates were working for good businesses.


Neither conversation was simply about wanting more money.


One candidate was becoming frustrated with the direction of their organisation and the impact that was having on their team.


  • As people left, the team changed.
  • As the team changed, the culture changed.
  • And as that happened, the candidate began considering whether there was a better fit elsewhere.


The other candidate had expected to progress in their career but hadn't received the promotion they anticipated.


The reason wasn't necessarily a lack of performance.


Their team leader was simply flat-out delivering projects.


It's easy to understand how that happens.


When project deadlines are tight and workloads are high, development conversations can move down the priority list.


But candidates don't stop thinking about their careers because their manager is busy.


They keep looking at what comes next.


And eventually, they may find that opportunity somewhere else.


These are individual conversations, not a statistical sample of Brisbane's engineering workforce.


But they highlight something businesses should be thinking about.


People don't always leave because they dislike their employer. Sometimes they leave because they stop seeing a future there.


Your best people don't always leave because of money


Salary will always matter.


Competitive remuneration is an important part of attracting and retaining engineering talent, particularly in a market where experienced candidates have options.


But it isn't the whole story.


People also want to know:

  • Where is my career going?
  • What can I learn here?
  • Is there a pathway to leadership?
  • Does my manager know where I want to go?
  • Am I working on projects that interest me?
  • Do I feel valued by the business?
  • Is the team I joined still the team I want to be part of?
  • Do I trust the direction of the organisation?


These questions become increasingly important when good people have options.


And that creates an important distinction for employers.


You don't only lose someone when they resign.


You can lose them months earlier when they stop seeing a future with you.


Retention is part of your capacity strategy


For engineering businesses, this isn't just a culture conversation.


It is a delivery conversation.


Winning a major project is only useful if you have the capability to deliver it.


If a consultancy wins more work but loses experienced engineers at the same time, the business can find itself recruiting simply to replace the people it has just lost.


That creates a cycle:

Win work → increase workload → put pressure on teams → development gets pushed aside → people leave → recruit to replace them → repeat.


In a tight market, that cycle becomes expensive.


And the cost isn't limited to recruitment.


When experienced engineers leave, businesses can also lose project knowledge, client relationships, technical capability and leadership experience.


The cost of turnover isn't always visible on a recruitment invoice.


So, what should Brisbane engineering firms be doing?


There isn't one solution.

But there are some straightforward questions worth asking.


1. Do your people know what comes next?


Career progression shouldn't only be discussed when someone asks about a promotion.

Good engineers want to understand what they need to demonstrate to move forward and what opportunities might be available to them.


If the only time someone talks about their career is when they have already decided to leave, the conversation is probably happening too late.


2. Are your team leaders actually able to lead?


A technically strong engineer isn't automatically a strong people leader.


As workloads increase, businesses need to make sure team leaders have the time and support to manage people, not just projects.


A manager who is permanently overloaded may struggle to provide the mentoring, feedback and development their team needs.


3. Are you listening before people leave?


Exit interviews are useful.


But they're too late.


Regular conversations with your team can uncover frustration before it becomes resignation.


That doesn't mean every request can be accommodated.


It means people know they have been heard.


4. Are you developing the team you'll need in 2032?


Six years sounds like a long time.


It isn't.


The graduate joining your business today could be a project engineer or emerging leader by 2032.


The engineer currently stepping into a senior role could be leading a major team.


Businesses need to think about the capability they will require in six years, not just the vacancies they need to fill this month.


5. Don't assume recruitment will solve everything


Recruitment remains an important part of building teams.


There will always be new projects, new roles and new capability requirements.


But when the market is competing for the same experienced engineers, businesses need to look at the entire employee lifecycle.


Attract. Develop. Retain.


Not simply:

Advertise. Recruit. Replace.


Brisbane's engineering market is an opportunity


There is a lot to be positive about.


Queensland's infrastructure programme is significant. Brisbane is continuing to grow, and the 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games provide an additional focus for infrastructure and development.


Engineers will be critical to all of it.


But the workforce required to deliver that pipeline won't appear overnight.


Engineers Australia continues to identify skills shortages as a major challenge for the profession and has warned that engineering shortages are affecting infrastructure delivery.


For Brisbane engineering businesses, that makes people strategy increasingly important.


The firms that will be best placed to take advantage of the opportunities ahead won't necessarily be the ones with the biggest recruitment budgets.


They will be the ones that understand how to build strong teams, develop their people and retain the experience they already have.


Because when everyone is looking for engineers, keeping the good ones becomes a competitive advantage.


What does this mean for engineering employers?


If you're planning your Brisbane engineering team for the next 12 months, don't only ask:

“Who do we need to hire?”


Ask:

“Who do we need to keep?”


Then ask:

“What will make them want to stay?”


Those questions are becoming just as important.


And with six years until Brisbane 2032, there isn't much value in waiting for the talent market to solve the problem for you.


Brisbane engineering recruitment


Vivid Recruitment works across the Built Environment, connecting engineering businesses with experienced professionals across building services, civil and structural engineering.


Our conversations with clients and candidates give us a direct view of what is happening in the market, from hiring demand and salary expectations to the factors influencing why people move.


If you're building an engineering team in Brisbane, or considering your next career move, we'd be happy to have a conversation.

Sydney Opera House sails against a bright blue sky
By Lee Stevens August 18, 2026
The short answer As 2027 nudges closer, Australian architecture firms are looking beyond impressive portfolios and job titles. They want people who can genuinely deliver projects, with strong documentation and BIM capability, solid project experience and the ability to communicate confidently with clients and consultants. At the same time, firms are becoming more considered about when and how they hire. Project pipelines, regional market conditions and the growing importance of flexibility are all influencing recruitment decisions. For architecture practices, the message is fairly simple: know exactly what you need, understand what the market can realistically provide and make sure your offer gives good people a reason to choose you. The role of the recruiter is changing too. Increasingly, firms need a specialist who can provide market intelligence, realistic salary benchmarking, insight into talent availability and advice on whether a permanent, contract or alternative recruitment approach makes the most sense. That's what we're seeing across the Australian architecture market as we look towards 2027. Delivery over dazzle This is probably the biggest shift we're seeing. A good portfolio still matters. A strong interview still matters. Experience and design ability obviously matter. But firms are becoming much more focused on what happens after the interview. Can this person actually deliver a project? Can they produce and coordinate documentation? Are they confident working in a BIM environment? Do they understand what happens as a project moves towards construction? Can they communicate with clients and consultants and hold their own in those conversations? There is a genuine concern among some practices about hiring someone who interviews beautifully, has an impressive portfolio and looks great on paper, only to discover that they can't actually get a job through to construction issue. That is why we're seeing more emphasis on genuine delivery capability. The conversation is moving away from simply asking, "What projects have you worked on?" It's becoming more about "What was your role on that project, and what did you actually deliver?" That's an important distinction. Documentation and BIM capability matter Design experience will always be important in architecture, but the ability to take that design thinking and turn it into a well-documented, coordinated and deliverable project is carrying real weight. Strong documentation skills and BIM competency continue to be sought after, particularly for practices that need people who can contribute to live projects without requiring significant support to get up to speed. This isn't about saying every architect needs to be a BIM specialist. It is about understanding the tools and processes being used within the practice and being able to work effectively within them. For clients, this means being clear about what they actually need before they start recruiting. A "Project Architect" in one practice can have a very different role from a "Project Architect" in another. One might be heavily involved in design and client presentations, while another could be responsible for documentation, consultant coordination and delivery. The title doesn't tell you enough. The detail does. Hiring is becoming more cautious We're also seeing less of the old urgency around recruitment. That doesn't mean firms aren't hiring. They are. But rather than automatically rushing to fill a vacancy, more practices are looking at their project pipeline and thinking carefully about what they are likely to need over the next six to twelve months. That caution makes sense. Projects get delayed. Feasibilities change. New work can take longer to commence than expected. A practice can be busy one month and suddenly find itself looking at a different pipeline a few months later. As a result, we're seeing more conversations around building talent pipelines and keeping good people on the radar rather than waiting until a vacancy becomes critical. Fixed-term and contract appointments are also becoming a more useful option for some practices, particularly where there is a need for additional capability but less certainty around the longer-term pipeline. For clients, that means the recruitment conversation shouldn't necessarily start with, "We need a permanent person." It should start with, "What do we actually need, and for how long?" There isn't one Australian architecture market This is another area where I think local knowledge makes a real difference. Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney are not operating in exactly the same market. Brisbane is currently running hot, with Queensland's broader economic momentum and the infrastructure and development activity associated with the 2032 Olympics contributing to demand. We're seeing particular interest in experienced Project Architects and people who can step into projects and deliver. Melbourne is active, but more measured. Sydney is active too, but we're seeing a different level of caution around project pipelines and hiring decisions. That regional nuance matters when you're recruiting. Salary expectations aren't necessarily the same. Candidate availability isn't necessarily the same. The types of projects driving demand aren't necessarily the same. So a one-size-fits-all recruitment strategy doesn't really work anymore. If you're hiring in Brisbane, you need someone who understands Brisbane. If you're hiring in Melbourne, you need someone who understands Melbourne. It sounds obvious, but it is surprisingly easy to lose sight of when recruitment becomes a numbers game. Flexibility is now part of the offer Salary is still important. Nobody is suggesting otherwise. But it is increasingly only one part of the conversation. When I'm talking to candidates, work-life balance , flexibility , culture, leadership and the type of work they're going to be doing are regularly part of the decision. For some people, salary will still be the deciding factor. For others, a better working arrangement or the opportunity to work on the right projects can be just as important. The smarter practices are recognising that. If you're struggling to attract good people, simply increasing the salary isn't always the answer. Sometimes the question should be: What else are we offering? And equally, what are we asking people to give up to come and work for us ? That's an important conversation for employers to have as we head into 2027. What do architecture firms actually want from a recruiter? This is probably the question I would encourage clients to ask when choosing a recruitment partner . Because I don't think most architecture practices need another person sending them CVs. They need someone who understands the sector. Someone who knows the difference between a good portfolio and genuine project experience. Someone who understands salary expectations and can benchmark a role against the current market. Someone who can tell them when a particular skill set is difficult to find. Someone who is responsive. And, importantly, someone who is prepared to tell them when their brief isn't realistic. That last one is important. A good recruiter shouldn't just agree with everything a client asks for. If the combination of salary, experience, software capability, project sector and location makes a role incredibly difficult to fill, the client needs to know that before they spend weeks looking for someone who doesn't exist. That's where market intelligence becomes valuable. Recruitment is becoming more of an advisory relationship I think this is where recruitment is heading. The best client relationships are becoming less transactional and more advisory. The value isn't simply in finding a candidate. It's in understanding the market well enough to help a client make a better hiring decision. Is the salary competitive? Is the level of experience realistic? Is that skill set actually available in this location? Would a contract appointment make more sense? Should the role be structured differently? Are candidates going to be attracted to what we're offering? These are conversations that should happen before the job advertisement goes live, not after three weeks of getting nowhere. A specialist recruiter should be able to bring that information to the table. So, what should architecture firms be thinking about for 2027? I don't think 2027 is going to be about one big recruitment trend. It is going to be about being more considered. Firms will still need good architects, designers and project professionals. But they are likely to be more selective about who they bring into the business and more conscious of how that person fits into their actual project pipeline. Candidates will continue to look beyond salary. Regional differences will continue to matter. Technical and delivery capability will continue to carry weight. And firms that understand what they need, move quickly when the right person becomes available and offer something that candidates genuinely value will put themselves in a much stronger position. For me, the biggest change is simple. Recruitment is no longer just about filling a vacancy. It's about understanding the market well enough to make the right hiring decision. That's what we try to bring to our client relationships at Vivid . We work exclusively across Architecture, Interior Design , Planning and Engineering , so our conversations aren't based on what we've found on a job board that morning. They're based on the people we're speaking to, the practices we're working with and what we're seeing across the market. If you're thinking about your architecture hiring for the remainder of 2026 or planning ahead for 2027, we're always happy to have a conversation about what we're seeing. No hard sell. Just an honest conversation about the market and what is likely to work.
Woman at desk looking confused, holding a calculator against an orange background.
By Nick Koop and Lee Stevens August 10, 2026
Salary matters when hiring & retaining built environment professionals. We look at the real cost of getting salary wrong across architecture, engineering & planning.
Hand placing a gold egg between two white eggs on a blue background
By Nick Koop August 3, 2026
Recruitment conversations often start with a salary range. "What's the market rate for this role?" "Can we find someone with these skills within this budget?"
Vivid x New Chapter Talent logo above two smiling people on a bright yellow background
By Vivid Recruitment July 16, 2026
As Architecture and Interior Design practices continue to compete for high-quality projects, marketing has become far more than a support function. From producing compelling bids and submissions to strengthening brand presence, creating engaging content and building lasting client relationships, the right marketing professional can have a significant impact on the growth of a practice. Yet finding experienced marketing talent with an understanding of the Architecture and Design industry isn't always easy.  The Growing Importance of Marketing in Architecture
Confused person with hands raised against a purple background
By Lee Stevens July 2, 2026
Thinking about accepting a counter offer? Learn what to consider before making a decision, common mistakes to avoid and expert advice from Vivid Recruitment.
Bold black “why vivid?” text on a bright yellow wall with a person walking by
By Vivid Recruitment June 22, 2026
About the Authors Nick Koop Director (Building Services Engineering) Nick specialises in building services recruitment across Australia, with a focus on mechanical, electrical, and fire engineering. He works closely with consultancies delivering major healthcare, infrastructure, and commercial projects, and has a strong track record placing senior engineers into technically demanding roles. Known for being straight-up and reliable, Nick spends most of his time in the detail, not the sales pitch. Lee Stevens Director (Architecture & Design) Lee is one of the founders of Vivid Recruitment and focuses on architecture and design studios across Australia. With years of experience working closely with directors and senior hires, he’s built long-term relationships based on trust and consistency. Lee’s approach is simple: understand what a business actually needs, cut out the noise, and get the right people in place without the usual recruitment carry-on. Contact Nick and Lee Nicholas Koop , Principal Recruitment Consultant, Engineering & Planning - 📲 0426 180 254 📧 nick@vividrecruitment.com.au Lee Stevens , Principal Recruitment Consultant, Architecture & Design - 📲 0406 470 020 📧 lee@vividrecruitment.com.au You can also connect with Lee on LinkedIn and Nick on LinkedIn or follow the Vivid Recruitment LinkedIn page for more industry insights, news, jobs and general chit chat and tips!
Smiling man in a black polo shirt against a green background
By Nick Koop June 4, 2026
Understand double representation in recruitment & its impact on job opportunities. Get insights for candidates in architecture & engineering.
Chalk words “FACTS” above crossed-out “MYTHS” on a blackboard background.
By Lee Stevens May 20, 2026
About the Author Lee Stevens, Director Lee has over 15 years of local and international recruitment experience across Architecture, Interiors, and Planning. Having worked with boutique studios through to large international consultancies, he’s built a reputation for honest advice, straightforward communication, and long-term relationships across the industry. Based in Melbourne, Lee is also a proud dad, sports fanatic, football coach, and someone who genuinely enjoys seeing good people build meaningful careers in architecture and design. Contact Lee Want to discuss your next role? Contact Lee Stevens , Principal Recruitment Consultant, Architecture & Design - 📲 0406 470 020 📧 lee@vividrecruitment.com.au You can also connect with Lee on LinkedIn or follow the Vivid Recruitment LinkedIn page for more industry insights, news, jobs and general chit chat and tips!
Brisbane riverfront skyline with colorful sign, green lawn, and clear blue sky
By Vivid Recruitment May 6, 2026
About the Authors Nick Koop Director (Building Services Engineering) Nick specialises in building services recruitment across Australia, with a focus on mechanical, electrical, and fire engineering. He works closely with consultancies delivering major healthcare, infrastructure, and commercial projects, and has a strong track record placing senior engineers into technically demanding roles. Known for being straight-up and reliable, Nick spends most of his time in the detail, not the sales pitch. Lee Stevens Director (Architecture & Design) Lee is one of the founders of Vivid Recruitment and focuses on architecture and design studios across Australia. With years of experience working closely with directors and senior hires, he’s built long-term relationships based on trust and consistency. Lee’s approach is simple: understand what a business actually needs, cut out the noise, and get the right people in place without the usual recruitment carry-on. Contact Nick and Lee Nicholas Koop , Principal Recruitment Consultant, Engineering & Planning - 📲 0426 180 254 📧 nick@vividrecruitment.com.au Lee Stevens , Principal Recruitment Consultant, Architecture & Design - 📲 0406 470 020 📧 lee@vividrecruitment.com.au You can also connect with Lee on LinkedIn and Nick on LinkedIn or follow the Vivid Recruitment LinkedIn page for more industry insights, news, jobs and general chit chat and tips!
Three chairs on a dark stage, with one bright pink chair standing out
By Lee Stevens April 29, 2026
Understand key factors for getting hired in architecture & design. Improve your chances today!